Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xelogen Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Xelogen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:10, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Xelogen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This term appears to be a brand name of THHC Lighting,[1] which may be a non-notable company. Based on Google searches of books and scholarly material, I saw no evidence that this name is part of the scientific nomenclature and I could find no verifiable confirmation of the claims made in the first paragraph. This article has been listed as an orphan since February, and has no references.—RJH (talk) 20:41, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:32, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination, stealth spam. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:10, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nomination. Agree with Smerdis of Tlön.—Tetracube (talk) 21:19, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: All that I can find is trivial mentions. Also, being an orphan is irrelevent. Joe Chill (talk) 02:25, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • True. I just mentioned the orphan status to demonstrate that this was not a new article and its issues have not been addressed during that time interval. I should have been clearer.—RJH (talk) 17:21, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.