Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XTMH Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/XTMH

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:04, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

XTMH (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Not seeing any independent reliable sources on google Nerfari (talk) 23:01, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. It sounds like it could be notable but Google has next to nothing on it. Maybe it will become more notable in time but it does not seem to be covered yet. No references are supplied. --DanielRigal (talk) 23:31, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Delete Only three google hits for "eXtreme Technology Multiprocessor Hyperlanguage": two of them are wikipedia, and the other provides no source and nothing more than a definition. Cazort (talk) 03:50, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 16:54, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - no evidence of notability from a google and google news search. ƒingers^on_Roids 23:28, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.