Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XML Copy Editor Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/XML_Copy_Editor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is that the subject does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NSOFTWARE. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 08:33, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

XML Copy Editor

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was recently restored after being deleted by PROD in 2010. It has no citations - only an external link to the program's own web site. I've done some searching, and I can find no sources aside from the usual indiscriminate software download portals, and a few trivial mentions on Google Scholar where it is mentioned that the program was used, but not described in any detail. Accordingly I think this does not meet either WP:GNG or WP:NSOFTWARE and should be re-deleted. MrOllie (talk) 12:42, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. MrOllie (talk) 12:42, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Non-notable software. No non-primary sources & significant coverage. Plus, it fails WP:PROMO. 🌺Kori🌺 - (@) 15:35, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - As stated above, reliable source coverage in support of this article simply doesn't exist. I agree. Deletion is the right call. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 08:21, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.