Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wireless remote-control switch Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Wireless_remote-control_switch

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 02:10, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wireless remote-control switch

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article has been around since 2012 and has never reached adequate quality. The subject appears too broad to reach encyclopedic status: there are simply too many unrelated forms of remote control switches to cover them all in this article, and specific remote controls are covered elsewhere like remote control. Not worth merging as there is not a lot of content here. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 06:30, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per TNT. Maybe someone will write this article one day, but when they do, this isn't going to be of any help. TimothyJosephWood 18:48, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 16:22, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:39, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Remote control. The article this is intending to be is already written, and it's immeasurably better. No harm in a redirect in case it help someone find the real article. I'm not sure why the nom thinks this article is somehow different from remote control. MB 02:33, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no real reason to redirect, since search would turn up the same article. Somewhat redundant title, since "remote" is almost always wireless anyway. W Nowicki (talk) 00:19, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.