Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Web mapping Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Web_mapping

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep as the topic is clearly notable. (non-admin closure) — Keithbob • Talk • 20:34, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Web mapping (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:TNT. Very poorly referenced, and is appallingly written; I have already removed two sections per WP:NPOV but I think it would be better starting again from scratch. Launchballer 10:40, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. I agree it is a poor quality article, but not so bad that it needs to be blown up and start over. IMO, the title is also awkward, maybe move it to Online maps? -- P 1 9 9  ✉ 14:13, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. I think it has a decent framework, and most of the errors are in lack of citation. Writing, etc. can be cleaned up. Sorry if my comment is formatted weird, it's my first time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nstockto (talk • contribs) 20:19, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's funny you should say that, I arrived at this article having typed 'advantages and disadvantages of online mapping' for an ICT task and thought that it should be at online mapping. I still stand by that thought.--Launchballer 16:25, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:43, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:44, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.