Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Web Pro Manager Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Web_Pro_Manager

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wifione ^Message 04:07, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Web Pro Manager

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable multi-blog publishing system. — Ṟ Ṉ™ 00:36, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Every reference I could find seems to have been generated by the people who created it. Another non-notable PHP CMS §FreeRangeFrog 01:06, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - First 100 Google hits reveal nothing more consequential than a directory listing [Here]. Another common case of SW companies that are good at creating 'hits' in a web search through paid and directory listings, but not a bit of reliable coverage in RS. If it's out there, it's deeper than I looked. Celtechm (talk) 03:02, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Promotional article for a product that hasn't been covered by secondary sources. Subject does not meet the general notability guideline.--xanchester (t) 15:27, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 18:17, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no reliable sources to establish notability of this software; created by an SPA as possibly promotional. Dialectric (talk) 14:21, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.