Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WebWiz@rd Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/WebWiz@rd

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 19:42, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WebWiz@rd

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails WP:NOTABILITY. Article history shows nothing but a couple of WebWiz@rd WP:SPA advertising-only accounts. no sources out there but PR and trivial coverage from non reliable secondary sources. Nothing more than using Wikipedia for Self-promotion and product placement, which wikipedia is WP:NOT. Hu12 (talk) 03:09, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:46, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:46, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per nom, SPA/promotional, and lacking reliable sources to establish notability. Dialectric (talk) 12:04, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 15:08, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No coverage found in independent reliable sources; does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:NSOFT at this time. Gongshow ^Talk 05:00, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.