Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WebNotes Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/WebNotes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 05:40, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WebNotes

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable website tagged under advert concerns since March 2009. Cloudbound (talk) 22:39, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete notability does not appear to be established and, given that the site is defunct, it's unlikely that it is going to happen. Artw (talk) 22:49, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. sst✈ 01:41, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. sst✈ 01:41, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as none of this suggests even a minimally better notable article. Notifying tagger Widefox. SwisterTwister talk 05:54, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete While notability isn't temporary, nothing but run of the mill borderline notability combined with clear COI promotion. (this was a COI mess). Widefox; talk 08:52, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect or merge to Web Annotation given the three reliable sources currently presented. They're news articles announcing the launch, however, and are not enough for the subject to have its own.和DITOR E tails 06:45, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.