Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WebFetch Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/WebFetch

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 23:33, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WebFetch (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:N. None of the sources in the article establish notability, and I couldn’t find any sources that would establish notability. This had a failed PROD in 2009 because two sources were added at that time. However, those sources are either primary or don’t cover the subject in depth. HyperAccelerated (talk) 18:23, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and Software. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:16, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:39, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Primary sources now in the article, all I can find are download repositories. Not seeing notability. Oaktree b (talk) 21:20, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:07, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge what can be merged to Web scraping, as I believe this is an instrumentality that enables that activity. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 01:41, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Does not have any secondary coverage to meet WP:GNG. (Merge not recommended as it is a Perl module used to essentially create a feed reader and there's no secondary sources anyways). StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 16:16, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.