Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warp Pipe (software developer) Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Warp_Pipe_(software_developer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 01:12, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Warp Pipe (software developer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Article about trivial, third-party GameCube software with no assertion of notability. Haipa Doragon (talk • contributions) 04:03, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 09:51, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:53, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge relevant information to Nintendo GameCube. As an aside, 'warp pipe' redirects to this article. Seeing as 'warp pipe' is a plausible search term, a redirect might be in order. -- Jelly Soup (talk) 08:18, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Further, while it may not be relevant to the AfD process, interested editors might find it interesting that a disambiguation page for the term 'warp pipe' was redirect to the aforementioned article. -- Jelly Soup (talk) 08:21, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Aitias // discussion 00:05, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - I'm seeing a bunch of stuff come up, though I cannot and will not vouch for any for the sake of WP:RS which is what is required for WP:N. Also, Warp pipe should probably be redirected to Mario (series)#Recurring gameplay elements... --Izno (talk) 01:39, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 00:02, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge for reasons above. -- MISTER ALCOHOL ^{T C} 03:19, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
• Comment Expanding on Izno's thought, it might be better to just reestablish Warp Pipe as a disambiguation page and link it to Mario (series)#Recurring gameplay elements and Nintendo GameCube respectively. -- Jelly Soup (talk) 22:18, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is there really any need for that? It seems a bit trivial, linking no full article. Haipa Doragon (talk • contributions) 00:06, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

True. Just seems to me that Warp Pipe is a plausible search term for a few things. Might be better to just redirect Warp Pipe to the aforementioned section on Mario, and add a 'Warp Pipe redirects here, if you're etc, etc, etc' love note to the start of the section. -- Jelly Soup (talk) 21:57, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Stubify - Content is unverified, but external links contain two reasonable interviews. Propose stripping content down to stub, and leave open for expansion using these sources, per WP:V. Marasmusine (talk) 19:21, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, stubbify, etc. - Those news articles look pretty good. Merging is not a good idea because it's a separate entity whose scope differs from that of the Nintendo GameCube article. SharkD (talk) 01:06, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.