Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Voodoo programming Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Voodoo_programming

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:10, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Voodoo programming (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Relies heavily on one source and fewer than 100 Google results. Probably not sufficiently notable or well-attested in RS to have its own article. Andre🚐 05:44, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Engineering, Computing, and Software. Andre🚐 05:44, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Wikipedia is not a dictionary, and this isn't notable. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 05:57, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above; the article is not notable and does not have enough reliable sources. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 07:19, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Article's subject is a non-notable WP:DICTDEF at best and doesn't appear to have any reliable sources available that would allow it to become anything more than that. - Aoidh (talk) 02:20, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.