Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Voicetext markup language Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Voicetext_markup_language

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 19:02, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Voicetext markup language

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found no significant coverage for this and the prod was contested. Fails WP:N. SL93 (talk) 16:13, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:51, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - proprietary (complete with TM symbol in the article) markup language that has received no coverage whatsoever in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 16:41, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 16:21, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.