Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Visual TimeAnalyzer Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Visual_TimeAnalyzer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 07:22, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Visual TimeAnalyzer

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

NN product. All three books cited are published by the same indie e-book publisher, and the first and third books are the same material with different chapter reference numbers. I'm into download links on the first page of GHits. MSJapan (talk) 04:10, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom - David Gerard (talk) 12:36, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:41, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:41, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non notable software fails WP:NSOFT and even the company article was deleted.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 13:02, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It is quite easy to find online coverage for a software. In this particular case, I found is really hard. Fails WP:NSOFT and WP:PRODUCT. There have been numerous time analysers, I don't see any particular reason to see this one as notable. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 01:42, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.