Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Visual Designer 3D Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Visual_Designer_3D

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:29, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Visual Designer 3D

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can't find any secondary sources about this product. Non-notable software. IagoQnsi (talk) 19:43, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I cannot find any sources referring to this company or this product. The product also appears to be quite new, so it hasn't had time to become notable. Chris vLS (talk) 15:59, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 20:04, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 20:04, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - None of this satisfies the software notability. SwisterTwister talk 06:02, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A search turned up download sites, but no significant WP:RS coverage. Article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional. Dialectric (talk) 05:20, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per above - nothing special about it or the company NealeFamily (talk) 23:38, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.