Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Visual Component Framework Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Visual_Component_Framework

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 14:11, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Visual Component Framework (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. All the reference provided are dead links and the project seems abandoned since 15 years. Internet search shows one book (but claims on its cover page to be sourced by Wikipedia article, and mostly blog entries and tutorials. Christophe (talk) 13:46, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Software. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 14:05, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Project activity shows that last update was 9 years ago. It's not 15 years but still superdead. Project has a generic name which you would expect from big entities like Microsoft, but it was developed by some random programmer. No independent (and reliable) sources to show notability. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 14:14, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.