Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Visual Build Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Visual_Build

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. MBisanz ^talk 02:22, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Visual Build (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Advertisement for non-notable piece of software Damiens.rf 17:18, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Non-notable, no references, advertisement _David^WS _(contribs) 18:14, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:43, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• This software seems to be very notable in .NET, its even been listed under Sys-con tools.NET Development tools. Its just poorly written, I will stub it and see if WikiProject Computing members think they can improve it. --Ramu50 (talk) 19:16, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep. Besides the review found by Ramu50, it's mentioned in a MSDN Magazine article; only a couple of paragraphs though. VG ☎ 02:20, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: per the sources that are in the article. Schuym1 (talk) 08:46, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep. Once expanded a bit or sources added it will be more compelling but I don't see an issue with having this stubby here. -- Banjeboi 02:25, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.