Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virtual CD-ROM Control Panel (2nd nomination) Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Virtual_CD-ROM_Control_Panel_(2nd_nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Microsoft PowerToys. (non-admin closure) Timotheus Canens (talk) 00:24, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Virtual CD-ROM Control Panel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nomination: This article fails to meet Wikipedia notability guideline requirements as it has failed to introduce significant coverage in secondary sources. Although this article has introduced sources, these sources only trivially mention the subject and provide no significant coverage.

Reason for re-nomination:

1. The reason given for abrupt closure of the first nomination is outweighed by the non-notability of this article. Good- or bad-faith, this article remains not notable.
2. The reason given for abrupt closure of the first nomination is invalid: Although I asked Joe Chill (talk · contribs) to nominate the article for deletion, I did alert him of the issue of faith. Fleet Command (talk) 23:02, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:45, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per nom. Handschuh-^{talk to me} 07:23, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• WP:PERNOM --Hm2k (talk) 11:16, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Redrect to Microsoft PowerToys where it's already covered. I've not seen any article discuss this one separately, but there are plenty of reliable independent sources for the PowerToys as a set. Pcap ping 13:53, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • See also Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Power_Calculator, which I nominated for the same reason. Pcap ping 13:54, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • Thanks, Pcap. I agree. I did not know it is part of PowerToys. Fleet Command (talk) 18:23, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep or Redirect to Microsoft PowerToys. --Hm2k (talk) 10:10, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Excuse me? Redirect and Keep are antonyms, aren't they? Keep means "don't touch" but Redirect means "delete contents, replace with a redirect to ..." (as was the case with List of ISO image software.) Merge is the middle ground: It means "merge the contents, delete contents of the original, replace with a redirect". Fleet Command (talk) 07:38, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Two nominations within a week for a stub seems unduly harsh. Justin talk 17:12, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions: Repeated nominations Fleet Command (talk) 09:05, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Microsoft PowerToys. TJRC (talk) 22:30, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Microsoft PowerToys after merging any useful information - EdoDodo ^talk 16:51, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.