Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Viktor Smolik (2nd nomination) Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Viktor_Smolik_(2nd_nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete per G4. Icestorm815 • Talk 21:07, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Viktor Smolik

Article was deleted as the result of a deletion discussion on June 19; it was recreated as "Viktor smolik" (note the lowercase) on June 21 with no evidence of any attempt to address the issues that led to its removal in the first place. It has since been moved over to the fomerly salted page. I'm not sure that the burden of proof for notability has been met on this one, but I'm willing to be proven wrong. User:AlbertHerring ^{Io son l'orecchio e tu la bocca: parla!} 14:35, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete again for the reasons in the first one. Niteshift36 (talk) 14:45, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. KuyaBriBri^Talk 14:55, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. KuyaBriBri^Talk 14:55, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No assertion of notability. Johnbod (talk) 15:01, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, for the umptenth time...artist is not notable. One or tweo more votes and I suggest we close as wp:snow. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 15:08, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:MYSPACE. It seems to me that the media were uploaded with the possible intent of promotion. Perhaps should have been speedied under WP:CSD#G4 (A7 was erroneous). Ohconfucius (talk) 15:16, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, With one more keep vote can we delete this article?. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 15:23, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

G4 Speedy Delete and salt Persistenly recreated. Hairhorn (talk) 16:18, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Might I suggest also salting "Viktor smolik", just to be on the safe side? --User:AlbertHerring ^{Io son l'orecchio e tu la bocca: parla!} 16:39, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete - all the reasons for deletion still apply. Enki H. (talk) 17:52, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete obviously some kind of self-publicity.--AssegaiAli (talk) 19:30, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as per above. No assertion of notability, recreated deleted material, etc. "Viktor smolik" should be salted as well. -kotra (talk) 20:38, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above...Modernist (talk) 21:24, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Entry author "Janet D. White" is (presumably) a sock of blocked user Anfisa Foxcat, please block, spam-only account. Hairhorn (talk) 23:30, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Anfisa is alerdy blocked, hownever I will checkuser them. The Junk Police (reports|works) 03:29, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - Update: The checkuser is here: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Anfisa Foxcat. The Junk Police (reports|works) 03:50, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.