Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Viewplex Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Viewplex

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Scott Burley (talk) 04:08, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Viewplex

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Relies on a Single Independent Site (Yahoo) which is a self-published press release. Bishal Shrestha (talk) 03:58, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The Yahoo reference is actually a press release published by PR Newswire which is worthless for establishing notability. Some of the other "refererences" are faked up links to other Wikipedia articles, which are also worthless for establishing notability. Others are promotional websites. No evidence of genuine notability. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 04:29, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:47, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:47, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:47, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:47, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I cannot find references that would establish notability. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 04:48, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Smells like a promotional page to me. creffett (talk) 15:02, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Not even close to meeting notability. Could likely be speedied. --CNMall41 (talk) 03:37, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt. The one who paid for this article, and the one who took their money, should be embarrassed ☆ Bri (talk) 01:08, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.