Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VeriCoin Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/VeriCoin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker^talk 00:20, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

VeriCoin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet GNG. The article only has three real references, four are first-party, one of them is from a generic cryptocurrency database and the other two you can submit your own articles. I was unable to find significant coverage of this crypto-coin from reliable sources independent of the subject. Afilja (talk) 18:12, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 18:23, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 18:23, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 18:25, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Easy call. No reliable independent secondary sources means no article. Msnicki (talk) 19:05, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete—Not seeing anything in the academic literature, NYTimes or WP:RS in google. Lesser Cartographies (talk) 08:40, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.