Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VSDX Annotator Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/VSDX_Annotator

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:36, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

VSDX Annotator (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lackluster references, #1 is an ad, #2 and #4 are down but probably also profiles, #3 is non-independent. Google search doesn't reveal anything better. Sungodtemple (talk • contribs) 18:22, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology and Software. Sungodtemple (talk • contribs) 18:22, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete : Fails WP:GNG based on my search results. Please ping me if good sources are identified. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 15:03, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.