Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UTF-9 and UTF-18 Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/UTF-9_and_UTF-18

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to April Fools' Day Request for Comments. Sandstein 13:22, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

UTF-9 and UTF-18

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Someone's April Fools' Day joke; unofficial; nonstandard; no secondary sources. As noted on the talk page, someone also invented a UTF-12, and any number of bits could theoretically be used to encode Unicode characters. Jc86035 (talk) 16:44, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 03:15, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to April Fools' Day Request for Comments. The April Fools' Day RFCs are a long standing tradition. However, each RFC itself may not be individually notable. Given that this article has existed since a long time and may be linked to from external websites, I would suggest a redirect to the main article.--DreamLinker (talk) 15:20, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.