Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Two-node cluster Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Two-node_cluster

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. v/r - T P 16:21, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Two-node cluster

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article content is so low quality and confused that it can not be salvaged. The topic itself is not notable or encyclopedic, and is better suited for a "how to" programmer's guide. I am beginning to clean up the cluster and distributed computing articles, and this type of alphabet soup is just embarrassing for Wikipedia. There are several like this, someone put text there 5 years ago, mostly confused and a liability, not an asset. This junk has to go before the whole series on Computer clustering can be cleaned up.

And unfortunately Wikipedia content is now being used to the detriment of science by irresponsible publications like this which just repackage the alphabet soup in these articles, then add an ISBN and a nice cover. History2007 (talk) 15:00, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 December 20. Snotbot t • c » 15:43, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 16:29, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep AFD is not cleanup. If articles about this general topic area are being worked then that's fine but deletion is not required for this. Merger is more appropriate. Warden (talk) 18:02, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What is there to merge? It is 99.99% garbage. There is nothing to merge. You merge them. But stop garbage from accumulating in Wikipedia. This is embarrassing. And the term is not notable. History2007 (talk) 18:07, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete A3 ([only] a rephrasing of the title)- it just says: "A two-node cluster is a computer cluster with two nodes...Two hosts, each with its own local storage device(s)...Some method of interconnection" --Northernhenge (talk) 21:30, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:08, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

';'Merge to Computer cluster - two node cluster is apparently more than a cluster with two computers, it is notable jargon related to cluster computing. --Kvng (talk) 23:37, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Try this too. But in any case there is nothing to merge. History2007 (talk) 02:56, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - and there is nothing to merge -- Whpq (talk) 18:38, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your work trying to clean this up. --Kvng (talk) 15:45, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Anyway, it is already merged in Computer_cluster#Basic_concepts as a fraction of a sentence, as I started to clean that up. So let me withdraw the Afd and move on. History2007 (talk) 00:08, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.