Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Turbo dispatch Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Turbo_dispatch

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk}_{about my edits?} 02:01, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Turbo dispatch (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete as notability has not been demonstrated nor any independent sources provided, despite tagging with these requirements in July 2010. – Fayenatic (talk) 21:46, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep This seems to be a notable protocol for British motoring organisations. The article has a good bibliography and just needs more work per our editing policy. Warden (talk) 22:57, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:22, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:23, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep This article is relevant to subjects regarding packet radio and communication. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.107.234.78 (talk) 12:41, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.