Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TreeDBNotes Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/TreeDBNotes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Salvio 10:08, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

TreeDBNotes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet WP:NSOFTWARE. Only reviews I can find are from software download sites, which are not independent sources. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 12:51, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 14:38, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 14:38, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Note to closer for soft deletion: While this discussion appears to have no quorum, it is NOT eligible for soft deletion because it has been previously PROD'd. --Cewbot (talk) 00:03, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Logs: 2012-03 ↻ restored, 2009-12 ✗ PROD

• Delete per nom - the two references in the article are their (currently-hacked) website, and a crowd-sourced review. I can't find any reliable references. power~enwiki (π, ν) 02:07, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Nor can I. Fails NSOFT. Ravenswing 01:32, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.