Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tree.io (software) Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Tree.io_(software)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 22:06, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tree.io (software) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Yet another minor "project management" website or software. This is made by a business we don't have an article about. The article offers no notability in the wider world. All other offered references are internal to the business. The article itself is simply a minimal listing of the maker and a features list, which essentially makes Wikipedia a free web host for advertising: this is essentially a sales brochure. Google News would appear to yield nothing but press releases and advertising. LoudHowie (talk) 17:57, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: I found no significant coverage. SL93 (talk) 04:25, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:53, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: all I found is hosted on some pretty obscure resources: In addition to an editor-rated review by the software's author (already in the article), I got a roundup of "10 Brand New Productivity Tools You Probably Missed" and a strange review of CRM history recommending Tree.io (on articlebase, it seems to be blocked here, so no links). I wouldn't consider those to be reliable sources. Note: the article was created by Renatello, who committed no unrelated edits. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 22:20, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.