Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transmogrifier (computer science) Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Transmogrifier_(computer_science)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 18:10, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Transmogrifier (computer science) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Procedural nomination due to {{hoax}} tag placed on article. A quick Google search doesn't turn up anything that matches this description. I can't figure out whether this should be redirected to something more appropriate or deleted as a hoax so I'm opening up for discussion.

I am currently neutral. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 15:46, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• delete --OpenFuture (talk) 16:14, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• delete I have found several articles that refer to this transmogrifier pattern, which is really another name for the facade pattern or whatever, and most use this wikipedia article as a source. If it is a hoax, and it may well have been, it has almost created its own reality. I guess I would lean toward weak delete here just based on the paucity of wp:n - these blogs/etc aren't really wp:rs. ErikHaugen (talk) 18:06, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • [Demeter Transmogrifiers To The Rescue, Haacked.com]
  • [Symfony versus The Law Of Demeter: does Symfony promote bad habits?]
  • [[1]] —Preceding unsigned comment added by ErikHaugen (talk • contribs) 17:56, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete — I added the second meaning of transmogrifier as TMG, the compiler generator language, which was mentioned by Dennis Ritchie in his CACM article on the development of the C language. That being said, I don't think there's anything here that qualifies as a complete WP article. — Loadmaster (talk) 18:21, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delemogrify per the above. JBsupreme (talk) 21:23, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:40, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.