Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Top Dutch Joint Solar Array Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Top_Dutch_Joint_Solar_Array

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:52, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Top Dutch Joint Solar Array (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

TopDutch (https://www.topdutch.com/) is a campaign commissioned by the Province of Fryslân, Province of Drenthe and Province of Groningen. By using TopDutch as the primary economic brand for initiatives and networks, the campaign supports northern ambitions and the northern ecosystem.

According to this article, The "Joint Solar Array" was apparently part of a promotional campaign to attract businesses or investors to the area. See for example this tweet they made directed to Elon Musk: https://twitter.com/TopDutchCom/status/960592776927809536

It never was a real solar farm, only a promotional campaign. One of the many they may have done. The campaign seems to have ended and there is no longer any mention of it on the TopDuch website. It is difficult to find other sources even talking about it.

I am not really convinced a promotional campaign like this needs a wikipedia article. It is definitely not a solar farm like the article currently says. Jexio (talk) 16:12, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Environment and Netherlands. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:28, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete This is about as close as I can find [1], appears to be an unrelated project. Delete for lack of sourcing. Oaktree b (talk) 18:57, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as a misleading promotional article. Thank you for nominating, Jexio! gidonb (talk) 23:27, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business and Technology. gidonb (talk) 23:29, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.