Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timelog Project Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Timelog_Project

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 08:14, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Timelog Project

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable software product. Claims of notability amount to 1) Microsoft Gold Partner -- an achievement any company can obtain by entering into the proper agreements with Microsoft; and 2) a Dagbladet Børsen Gazelle Award which, according to the reference provided, is awarded to over 2000 companies each year -- hardly an elite group. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:27, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No evidence of notability, and borderline spam, though perhaps not enough so for speedy deletion. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:48, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:17, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:15, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Sources do not establish notability. - MrOllie (talk) 23:47, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.