Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Time domain vernier method Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Time_domain_vernier_method

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:44, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Time domain vernier method (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't find sources to establish its notability. I would be interested to hear from those who work in this area if they have had more luck. Boleyn (talk) 18:21, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Engineering and Technology. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:38, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. This is already covered in the time-to-digital converter page. Ships&Space (talk) 21:09, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.