Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Time dilation with cosmic strings Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Time_dilation_with_cosmic_strings

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. and salt Courcelles 17:22, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Time dilation with cosmic strings

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Author has removed prod so it comes to AfD. Let's be gentle and just say original research. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:02, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Yes, and in view of the claims being of an extraordinary nature, references to reliable sources do seem to be somewhat lacking. In fact, I see the article is "signed" by "layton rushing" so could it be quickly dispensed with as a hoax? Thincat (talk) 11:35, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 18:38, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as original research. Several Times (talk) 19:27, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, unsourced original essay, title is not a plausible redirect to anything. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:14, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. The article has been speedy deleted before. The article's recreator has been blocked by nominator for sock puppetry. --Lambiam 07:38, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as OR. -- 202.124.75.178 (talk) 11:04, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.