Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Things Solver Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Things_Solver

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 12:19, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Things Solver (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Article created by contributor with conflict of interest. Frap (talk) 11:51, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Frap (talk) 11:51, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology, Software, and Serbia. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:21, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: I could find one good source: a case study about its acquisition by ASEE. But I could not find anything else that meets WP:SIRS. The existing sources in the article are mostly primary sources or don't contain much coverage of the company. Not opposed to draftification, since the article is new. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 03:39, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.