Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Java Posse Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_Java_Posse

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. Jinian (talk) 13:19, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Java Posse (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject is not notable even with current sources. No significant coverage by any mainstream sources such as cnn or the Wall Street journal. Recommend deletion as article is written more as a promotion for the podcast. --Hvcgvngc (talk) 18:06, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 June 2. —cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 18:25, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:43, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• delete - not notable per nom --Jgufhvjb (talk) 00:54, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • please note that the editors of this article are from the podcast itself (account CarlQuinn is very similar to the name of the host of the show Carl Quinn). May actually qualify for speedy deletion.

--Jgufhvjb (talk) 01:09, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• delete. Not notable. --BeerBelly82 (talk) 22:14, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment, There's some sourcing out there: [1], p82-4; [2]; [3], but most of it is behind paywalls. --j⚛e decker^talk 03:20, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • These sources don't make this article notable. Showing up in a lIst of podcasts does not make it notable. --BeerBelly82 (talk) 21:07, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Just not seeing the sourcing necessary to pass WP:GNG. --— Rhododendrites ^talk |  04:08, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.