Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Textbox.io Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Textbox.io

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 04:11, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Textbox.io

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails to mention Notability, at the moment its reads like an advert. Avono (talk) 09:40, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:59, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:59, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: A WP:SPA article on a visual editor. The Prod was removed by an IP with the comment "This is notable as it is a recently-released software product. This product is a member of a notable category of software which contains many other software products." Any recent new item in an existing software field is not inherently notable, and I am not finding evidence that this one has attained notability. AllyD (talk) 20:00, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A search turned up no RS coverage.Dialectric (talk) 12:15, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.