Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Textbase Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Textbase

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 02:39, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Textbase (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't establish that this meets WP:NOTABILITY. Has been tagged for notability for 7 years unresolved. Boleyn (talk) 19:42, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete-per nom. Wgolf (talk) 20:41, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, the reference from Armand might be substantial, but given that there's not much else on this group apart from blog reviews and the like, I'm not at all convinced. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 12:43, 31 March 2015 (UTC).[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:42, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:42, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:42, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:42, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:43, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Article sourced to a review site. Does not pass notability. AlbinoFerret 20:17, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete – Source searches are not providing adequate coverage to qualify an article for this topic, relative to WP:N. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:56, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.