Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tensor flight dynamics Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Tensor_flight_dynamics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 00:35, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tensor flight dynamics

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence this topic is notable enough for inclusion. The bulk of the content of this article appears to be sourced only to papers by the creator of the article. (The additional references to prior works solely define the background concepts and do not discuss the topic of tensor flight dynamics.) The article reads like a review of the author's work without imparting any actual information about the topic. Kinu ^t/_c 20:16, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as non-notable: nothing for "Tensor flight dynamics" on ZMATH, two relevant hits hits on GBooks, three on Scholar. Deltahedron (talk) 20:34, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:22, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:22, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete—Mostly per Deltahedron. I poked around the IEEE Explorer site and did a bit more hunting through google scholar, and there's just not enough there there. Lesser Cartographies (talk) 06:17, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.