Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Techpoint.ng Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Techpoint.ng

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Killiondude (talk) 21:23, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Techpoint.ng

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Three year old website that does not meet the notability guidelines for a technology portal. HandsomeBoy (talk) 17:38, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Mahveotm (talk) 17:12, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Mahveotm (talk) 17:12, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Mahveotm (talk) 17:12, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Mahveotm (talk) 17:12, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Strongly support delete - equally strongly, would recommend that the author's other articles are reviewed. I've now looked at 3/4, on the back of an odd situation at Afc, and they are all of poor quality, weakly sourced, contain promotional language and have all the hallmarks of being the creations of an undeclared paid editor. KJP1 (talk) 17:47, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Per source searches, does not meet WP:WEBCRIT. Source searches are providing no significant coverage in reliable sources to qualify an article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:37, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable. Acnetj (talk) 20:43, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.