Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Techlink Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Techlink

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:51, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Techlink

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I had difficulty finding valid info amongst the plethora of google hits but everything points to it being a non-notable website. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 05:42, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. 05:43, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Delete. I wouldn't even call it a plethora of hits, everything is tied back to the site itself. Seems like a bit of promotion here. MezzoMezzo (talk) 07:24, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:14, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 10:58, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Theopolisme (talk) 00:05, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. czar · · 00:18, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. czar · · 00:18, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No indication of notability or outstanding contribution—just a plain company. Doesn't pass WP:COMP as is. czar · · 00:37, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.