Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Techdog Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Techdog

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 20:17, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Techdog

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find any evidence that the term "Techdog" is used to refer to robotic dogs, which is what this article appears to be about. In addition, it is unsourced, and what is here appears to be already covered at List of robotic dogs or the various articles on that list. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 21:54, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:29, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Go ahead and delete - The word makes it challenging to search but from what I can see, there's no solid sources supporting this and the article reads more like an essay. SwisterTwister talk 05:04, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mellowed Fillmore (talk) 04:07, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Definitely finding nothing that lends this term to being at all popularized or actually used anywhere. Need sources or delete ASAP. Kemosakeyouknow (talk) 01:20, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.