Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tech Times Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Tech_Times

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is that that article does not meet the main notability guideline Davewild (talk) 19:17, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tech Times

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable magazine. Article lacks non-trivial, independent support. reddogsix (talk) 03:17, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:43, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:43, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:43, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - The Magazine is quite popular in India and it is not intended for World next editon will come with world concentration hence it is right to have the article from start — Preceding unsigned comment added by Somyatiwari538 (talk • contribs) 04:29, 13 May 2015 (UTC) — Somyatiwari538 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Comment - If it is popular in India, then there should be some corresponding non-trivial references that can be added to the article that will support notability. Unless you can prove notability there is no "right" for the article to exist in Wikipedia. reddogsix (talk) 15:10, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Please Close the disscussion as soon as possible as i want that diloge to be removed from that page its affecting my repotation — Preceding unsigned comment added by Somyatiwari538 (talk • contribs) 10:40, 14 May 2015 (UTC) — Somyatiwari538 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Comment - Please provide valid non-trivial references to the article that will support notability. reddogsix (talk) 15:10, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Promoting itself and this title is popular for other things. VandVictory (talk) 00:41, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:43, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No evidence of notability provided. This is not http://www.techtimes.com/ ~Kvng (talk) 14:47, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as Kvng suggests, there are sources, but for the US Tech Times, not this one. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 10:40, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.