Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tech Compiler Data Systems Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Tech_Compiler_Data_Systems

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. czar ⨹ 16:19, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tech Compiler Data Systems (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't Meet Wikipedia notability guidelines Lakun.patra (talk) 10:21, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:24, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:24, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:24, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:50, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Not notable and unsourced WP:NCORP. Harsh (talk) 22:31, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete It's a stub, promotional, unsourced and out of date. No substantive edits since it was first added in 2010. – Margin1522 (talk) 21:01, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Software company article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A search turned up no independent significant coverage. This article's creator is an SPA, so it is possibly promotional in nature.Dialectric (talk) 11:31, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - unsourced, and Google search doesn't bring up usable sourcing. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 14:40, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.