Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teamwork Project Manager Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Teamwork_Project_Manager

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus seems to be that there are not enough reliable, secondary sources to establish notability. NW (Talk) 21:42, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Teamwork Project Manager

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable software product by SPA. Cannot find significant coverage. Haakon (talk) 21:40, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.
Delete per nom. BlazerKnight (talk) 22:20, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --GreyCat (talk) 01:00, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep: I found [1], [2], and [3]. Joe Chill (talk) 01:52, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This is advertising; the only information in the article is a feature list and non-neutral puffery: Teamwork Project Manager is used by thousands of well known companies around the world.... Even if this were notable, it would still need to be re-written from scratch. And two of the sources found by Joe Chill would appear to be blogs rather than reliable sources. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 04:01, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not enough reliable, secondary sources to show notability.--Unionhawk ^Talk ^E-mail ^Review 17:57, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.