Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taxi Programming Language Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Taxi_Programming_Language

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:55, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Taxi Programming Language (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I cannot find any sources to establish this language's notability. Additionally, it has had the "notability" tag for almost a year. Christopher Monsanto (talk) 16:39, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:18, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:08, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. This article falls severely short of the general notability guideline of receiving "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" by a long shot. I can't find a single non-trivial source in Google regarding this topic (here are the results of my search), meaning that we don't even have to establish unreliability of sources here, as there are no sources to establish the unreliability of! A Google Books search throws up nothing, and furthermore, the book reference cited by the article appears to be a print on demand publication (while this is not enough to establish unreliability in itself, the fact that the book doesn't show up in Google Books worries me). Put simply, this article is just not notable. Arctic Night 00:20, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.