Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/T-code Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/T-code

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Bait30 ^{Talk 2 me pls?} 17:41, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

T-code

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Exists, but doesn't meet any aspect of WP:NOTABILITY. Boleyn (talk) 16:32, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 16:36, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The topic easily passes WP:GNG because entire books are written about it: [1]; [2]; [3]. Andrew🐉(talk) 17:29, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Week Keep page needs improvement with addition of refs which show its notability. As Andrew showed there is books written on the subject. Davidstewartharvey (talk) 18:25, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Article name seems a bit pretentious for the SAP T-code (perhaps more properly Transaction codeTransaction code given alternative candidates like [4] and perhaps bank transaction codes but that may just be a Google search AI guess based on the WP redirect. At best should probably be a sentence on SAP; the article as it stands if probably more appropriate for WikiBooks if anyone has the energy to preserve it there (I haven't). The article may be relying on sources in the external links not just the references, which while not best practice needs to be accounted for.Djm-leighpark (talk) 08:37, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the subject passes our general notability guidelines. Andrew D has found several sources which show that the subject is notable. Lightburst (talk) 17:14, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.