Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/System lifecycle Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/System_lifecycle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Systems development life cycle. Mergers are cheap. (non-admin closure) J947 05:16, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

System lifecycle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable subject (only one real google scholar result), article reads like a presentation, but moreover it's almost completely technical jargon. Pishcal (talk) 03:10, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:09, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge with Systems development life cycle. Unfortunately, this article was created very early on and has continued since, with one major expansion, in parallel with the canonically named SDLC article. --pmj (talk) 14:27, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.