Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SwiftUI Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/SwiftUI

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 06:57, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

SwiftUI (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG. Was draftified in hopes of improvement, then moved back by an editor without improvement. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:00, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:07, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Had many books written about it, including Wiley, Springer, Packt Publishing (programming-focused) and others. Also received SIGCOV in tech news outlets alone: [1][2]. DFlhb (talk) 02:23, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. As DFlhb mentioned, this software is used in independent instructional manuals giving it presumed notability following WP:NSOFT. WP:NEGLECT is not a strong rationale for deletion. 2001:48F8:3004:FC4:D480:5FD5:9310:3BA4 (talk) 22:59, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.