mic_none

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sudip Pandey (2nd nomination) Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sudip_Pandey_(2nd_nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. JBW (talk) 10:11, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sudip Pandey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is may not notable according to WP:NACTOR and does not meet the requirements for WP:SIG in reliable, independent sources. 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 18:52, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 23:26, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× 15:10, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Keep There is a lot of coverage of his death. Searching on his name in Devanagari (सुदीप पांडे), I also find some coverage of his films prior to his death, particularly V for Victor, which could be added to the article. RebeccaGreen (talk) 14:21, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @RebeccaGreen, Thank you for your advice. I have added some additional sources as citations and expanded the article with his political career. Can you review it again?
    Zuck28 (talk) 09:17, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Improved the article. Given his acting career, which includes lead roles in more than 40 films and notable awards, he easily passes Wp:NACTOR. Given the significant amount of news coverage about his death and political career, he passes Wp:GNG and Wp:ANYBIO. speedy keep‎ per WP:SK#4.Zuck28 (talk) 06:40, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. Please note that the AfD does not qualify for speedy keep under Wikipedia:Speedy_keep#4, since subsequent editors added substantive comments in good faith before the nominator's blocked or banned status was discovered.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× 07:34, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.