Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stellar Phoenix Mac Data Recovery Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Stellar_Phoenix_Mac_Data_Recovery

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:24, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stellar Phoenix Mac Data Recovery

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unremarkable software program. Refs are entirely from its own website. No evidence of independent notability offered or found. KDS4444 (talk) 12:06, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:55, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep. I see full editorial reviews in PCmag and TechRepublic. That's has usually been considered sufficient secondary sourcing for notability , but I'm not an expert in this area. DGG ( talk ) 23:06, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@KDS4444: @DGG:@CAPTAIN RAJU: Thanks for your time to share feedback on my page, I have added more helpful resources please have a look Amitpandeys0281

I withdraw my nomination The references still need to be placed following the claims they are meant to be supporting, but the review in PC Magazine appears to be enough to qualify this program as notable. KDS4444 (talk) 07:01, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@KDS4444: Thank you so much for your review and trust, It would be great if your please also remove the deletion notice from the page Amitpandeys0281

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.