Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SpringPublisher Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/SpringPublisher

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Cirt (talk) 15:35, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

SpringPublisher (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Very new software. This one gets a fair number of google hits, but they are all to press release type posts on various blogs, nothing rising to what I would consider a reliable source, so it fails the general notability guideline. PROD was removed by the article author without comment, so here we are at AFD. MrOllie (talk) 11:38, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 11:49, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - I didn't see any notable mentions on Yahoo, but again it could be to the company being is new. Perhaps Wikipedia:TOOSOON would apply here. SwisterTwister talk 02:38, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - I do not see any coverage except PR/promotional non-independent variety. VQuakr (talk) 04:54, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.