Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spectrum of knowledge preservation and transferring Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Spectrum_of_knowledge_preservation_and_transferring

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete a1, context is unclear (in fact, incomprehensible). NawlinWiki (talk) 15:53, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Spectrum of knowledge preservation and transferring (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable subject. Should be deleted. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 15:02, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —Ism schism (talk) 15:04, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Ism schism (talk) 15:06, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Ism schism (talk) 15:07, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong delete Pile of self-promoting, unsourced original thought, and nonsensical to boot. No amount of copyediting is going to fix this. Yunshui 雲‍水 15:11, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Note I added a speedy delete. This seems like a hoax/gibberish. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 15:36, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.